Comparing SPV structures in private market investing

Augment offers a cutting-edge way to invest in pre-IPO companies — but it’s not the only way. Investors are increasingly turning to special purpose vehicles to gain exposure to the private secondary market. Do the advantages of SPVs outweigh their drawbacks?

Special purpose vehicles (SPVs) enable a group of investors to pool their funds into one investment. They also comprise an increasingly core pillar of the private secondary market.

Let’s break down everything to know about SPVs, their fee models, and their implications for accredited and retail investors alike.

What is an SPV?

An SPV is a legal entity created to pool capital from multiple investors for a single investment opportunity, often a private company. Common use cases include direct investments into startups, sidecar vehicles alongside larger VC funds, and joint ventures. 

Some emerging platforms leverage SPVs to enable non-accredited investors to invest in fractional shares of privately held firms for a smaller upfront cost than buying actual company stock. One example, MicroVentures, requires a minimum investment of just $100. 

Contrast that with Augment*, which allows users to buy and sell full shares of startups and other pre-IPO companies, but is only available to accredited investors. The former approach comes with unique benefits — but also drawbacks.

Advantages and disadvantages of SPVs

SPVs provide several possible benefits for investors. These include:

  • Simplicity: SPVs maintain a narrow focus on a single investment, reducing complexity in portfolio management.
  • Lower Costs: By pooling together funds, individual investors may be able to invest less in an asset with high growth potential, while accessing the same exposure. 
  • Isolated Risk: Since each SPV is legally distinct, any financial or legal issues would be confined to that vehicle, protecting broader portfolios and reducing exposure.

However, there are disadvantages to the SPV structure, as well. To name a few:

  • Concentration: The flipside of simplicity is a lack of diversification. SPVs are typically raised to invest in one company, making them less diversified than a typical fund.
  • Lack of Rights: A shareholder of a company may have certain rights, such as a say in the company’s direction. An SPV investor does not. 
  • Lack of Access: SPVs are managed by a single owner, meaning investors also do not have direct access to the companies in which they are investing. 
  • Fees: SPV managers may charge fees, which can ultimately make investing in an SPV less cost-effective than buying stock directly. 

SPV structures

The two most common legal structures for SPVs are limited liability companies (LLCs), the standard for U.S.-based deals, and limited partnerships (LPs), often used when working with institutional investors. SPVs can also take the form of joint ventures (JVs) or offshore SPVs.

Comparing SPV fee models: 2/20 vs. 0/0

What is the 2/20 structure?

The 2/20 model is one of the most common SPV fee structures, particularly for larger or more complex deals. In this structure, fund managers charge a 2% annual management fee on committed capital and take 20% carried interest (“carry”) on profits above a certain threshold.

What is the 0/0 structure?

The 0/0 model, more common for smaller deals, includes no management fee and no carried interest. In lieu of traditional fees, managers may negotiate alternative incentives, such as taking a portion of the equity or future profits.

How fees impact investor returns

Fee structures play a key role in determining net returns for investors. 

Carried interest mechanics

Carry is only earned after investors receive their initial capital back, along with a “preferred return” or “hurdle rate”, which is typically in the range of 6% to 8%. Once the hurdle is cleared, profits are split. 

In the case of the 2/20 model, the SPV manager receives 20% of the profits following the preferred return. The other 80% is shared by the individual investors.

Management fees and cost considerations

Management fees typically cover SPV setup, compliance, legal, and administrative work. These extra costs may reduce returns, if not offset by upside. 

The bottom line

Special purpose vehicles have become a mainstay of private market investing, thanks to their often-low upfront costs and potentially high pay-offs. SPVs provide a wider pool of investors with exposure to unique assets. But they also introduce additional considerations, such as management fee structures. 

Ultimately, the right private investment vehicle depends on each investor’s goals, risk profile, and expectations. Meanwhile, the secondary market grows stronger and more robust with each new means of accessing it. After all, a rising tide lifts all vehicles, special purpose or otherwise. 

*Securities transactions are executed on Augment Capital, LLC's ATS and offered through Augment Capital, LLC (member FINRA/SIPC). 

Important Disclosures: Investing in private securities involves substantial risk, including the potential loss of principal. Private securities are typically illiquid, have limited pricing transparency, and often require longer holding periods. These investments are available exclusively to qualified accredited investors and offer no guarantee of returns. Additionally, past performance of private securities does not indicate or predict future results.

Ready to explore private markets?

Create your Augment account to browse companies, pricing, marketplace listings and collective funds.

Create account

End-to-end Transactions

Real-time pricing data

Low investment minimums

Verified investors & sellers/accredited individuals